The 14th Great Lakes Bioinformatics Conference 2019 (GLBIO) took place at the University of Wisconsin at Madison from May 19th to 22nd. The conference was organized by the Great Lakes Bioinformatics Consortium to provide an interdisciplinary forum for the discussion of research findings and methods in bioinformatics. An important goal for the conference was to foster long-term collaborative relationships and networking opportunities within the domain of computational approaches to biology. The conference committee accepted 5 full-length original research papers for oral presentations at the conference, all of which were then submitted and accepted for inclusion in the PLOS Collection devoted to the conference.
This year marks the 14th Great Lakes Bioinformatics Conference and has attracted 277 attendees from eight countries. The conference agenda included three different tutorials and workshops on a wide variety of topics including UCSC Genome Browser, dimensionality reduction methods for biomedical data and employing docker for software development and reproducibility. In addition, it included 10 research sessions and 6 invited keynote speakers providing updates on several exciting areas of research and education, spanning population genetics, evolutionary biology, host-pathogen interactions, precision medicine, systems biology, big data analytics and drug repositioning. The conference also attracted 114 poster presentations presented in two poster sessions.
GLBIO 2019 Research Papers:
Accepted papers from the conference paper submissions included in this collection comprised of a new clustering approach for biological sequences using phylogenetic trees (Balaban et al, 2019), a framework for prediction of regulatory elements from partial data (Zhang and Mahony, 2019), a new resolution function which can efficiently quantify and compare the shapes of phylogenetic trees by encoding them with a single number (Hayati et al, 2019), improved connectivity measures for signaling networks based on hypergraphs to facilitate signaling pathway analysis and prediction (Franzese et al, 2019) as well as an integrative approach to predict protein-RNA binding by considering thermodynamic and sequence contexts of RNA revealing the increasing interest in integrative data mining and machine learning approaches on multi-omic datasets and employing such datasets for systems biology studies (Su et al, 2019). A summary of each of these works is detailed below:
Abstract: Phylogenetic trees are frequently used in biology to study the relationships between a number of species or organisms. The shape of a phylogenetic tree contains useful information about patterns of speciation and extinction, so powerful tools are needed to investigate the shape of a phylogenetic tree. Tree shape statistics are a common approach to quantifying the shape of a phylogenetic tree by encoding it with a single number. In this article, we propose a new resolution function to evaluate the power of different tree shape statistics to distinguish between dissimilar trees. We show that the new resolution function requires less time and space in comparison with the previously proposed resolution function for tree shape statistics. We also introduce a new class of tree shape statistics, which are linear combinations of two existing statistics that are optimal with respect to a resolution function, and show evidence that the statistics in this class converge to a limiting linear combination as the size of the tree increases. Our implementation is freely available at https://github.com/WGS-TB/TreeShapeStats.
Author Summary: Histone modifications and other gene regulatory signals can be profiled across the genome in a given cell type, and each type of regulatory signal correlates with the presence of specific gene regulatory activities. Genome segmentation methods look for patterns across combinations of regulatory signals to annotate more general “regulatory states” (e.g. enhancers, promoters, repressed regions, etc.) across the genome. To see how regulatory states change across cell types, we need to run genome segmentation in a consistent way across the analyzed cell types. However, due to experimental and cost limitations, we may not have profiled the same regulatory signals in all available cell types. Current approaches deal with this missing data problem by either limiting genome segmentation analysis to the subset of regulatory signals that have been profiled in all analyzed cell types (which limits the types of regulatory states that can be detected and/or the numbers of cell types that can be analyzed), or by predicting what the missing regulatory signals would have looked like. The latter “imputation” approach is computationally costly, and is not always accurate. The current manuscript introduces a third strategy to handling missing data in the genome segmentation problem. Our approach, based on the IDEAS genome segmentation platform, removes the need for data imputation by directly accounting for missing data within the algorithm. In cell types where some regulatory signals are missing, IDEAS can still provide accurate regulatory state annotations based on a combination of the regulatory signals that have been observed in that cell type, the regulatory states annotated at the same location in other cell types (which may be based on more complete regulatory signal information), and the regulatory states in surrounding regions.
Author Summary: Signaling pathways describe how cells respond to external signals through molecular interactions. As we gain a deeper understanding of these signaling reactions, it is important to understand how molecules may influence downstream responses and how pathways may affect each other. As the amount of information in signaling pathway databases continues to grow, we have the opportunity to analyze properties about pathway structure. We pose an intuitive question about signaling pathways: when are two molecules “connected” in a pathway? This answer varies dramatically based on the assumptions we make about how reactions link molecules. Here, examine four approaches for modeling the structural topology of signaling pathways, and present methods to quantify whether two molecules are “connected” in a pathway database. We find that existing approaches are either too permissive (molecules are connected to many others) or restrictive (molecules are connected to a handful of others), and we present a new measure that offers a continuum between these two extremes. We then expand our question to ask when an entire signaling pathway is “downstream” of another pathway, and show two case studies from the Reactome pathway database that uncovers pathway influence. Finally, we show that the strict notion of connectivity can capture functional relationships among proteins using an independent benchmark dataset. Our approach to quantify connectivity in pathways considers a biologically-motivated definition of connectivity, laying the foundation for more sophisticated analyses that leverage the detailed information in pathway databases.
Author Summary: RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play a key role in modulating various cellular processes, including transcription, alternative splicing, and translational regulation. Identifying protein-RNA interactions and the binding preferences of RBPs are critical to unraveling the mechanism of post-transcriptional gene regulation. In the current study, we present a computational approach that integrates both structure and sequence contexts for protein-RNA binding prediction. We propose to incorporate the structure information using a thermodynamic ensemble of secondary structures, which effectively identifies RBP-binding structural preferences, especially for structured RNAs. Our model is further empowered by a deep neural network that combines the sequence and structure information to achieve improved protein-RNA binding prediction. Extensive experiments on both in vitro and in vivo datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our method compared to several state-of-the-art approaches. This study suggests the great potential of our method as a practical tool for identifying novel protein-RNA interactions and binding sites of RBPs.
Abstract: Clustering homologous sequences based on their similarity is a problem that appears in many bioinformatics applications. The fact that sequences cluster is ultimately the result of their phylogenetic relationships. Despite this observation and the natural ways in which a tree can define clusters, most applications of sequence clustering do not use a phylogenetic tree and instead operate on pairwise sequence distances. Due to advances in large-scale phylogenetic inference, we argue that tree-based clustering is under-utilized. We define a family of optimization problems that, given an arbitrary tree, return the minimum number of clusters such that all clusters adhere to constraints on their heterogeneity. We study three specific constraints, limiting (1) the diameter of each cluster, (2) the sum of its branch lengths, or (3) chains of pairwise distances. These three problems can be solved in time that increases linearly with the size of the tree, and for two of the three criteria, the algorithms have been known in the theoretical computer scientist literature. We implement these algorithms in a tool called TreeCluster, which we test on three applications: OTU clustering for microbiome data, HIV transmission clustering, and divide-and-conquer multiple sequence alignment. We show that, by using tree-based distances, TreeCluster generates more internally consistent clusters than alternatives and improves the effectiveness of downstream applications. TreeCluster is available on GitHub.
The next GLBIO conference will be held at the University of Minnesota in May 2021 and we look forward to another exciting meeting.